From the current market perspective, although building material prices are not fluctuating as dramatically as in previous years, they are still affected by multiple factors and are unlikely to stabilize completely in the short term.

The ongoing geopolitical tensions surrounding Iran and Ukraine have heightened uncertainty in global markets. Although the two countries are located in different regions, in the current globalized context, any regional conflict will have a ripple effect on the world economy through energy, transportation, and raw material supply chains.

In the past few years, the Chinese PC sheet market has developed rapidly, expanding from initial basic building material applications to transportation engineering, public buildings, and industrial sectors.

Polycarbonate sheets are transitioning from "alternative material" to "mainstream choice."For a long time, PC sheets in engineering projects were primarily seen as an alternative to glass or traditional building materials. However, recent years have seen a shift in this perception.

PC sheets may look identical, but why are there such significant differences in performance? Many customers have a common observation when purchasing PC solid sheets: they look similar, have similar transparency, but the prices differ considerably. Initially, many tend to choose the cheaper option, thinking that since they are just "sheet materials," there shouldn't be much difference. However, after a period of actual use, problems begin to appear: yellowing, brittleness, cracking, and even replacement shortly after installation. These problems are not accidental; they are problems that were already present during the material selection stage.

In many outdoor projects, one of the most frequent customer complaints is that while the sheets are initially very transparent, they begin to yellow and even become brittle after a period of use.

In recent years, polycarbonate sheets have become increasingly common in shopping mall corridors, park passageways, carports, and skylights. Many customers, upon first encountering this material, often offer a straightforward assessment: it's cheaper than glass, hence its widespread use. However, attributing this solely to "cheapness" underestimates the value of polycarbonate sheets in engineering projects.

In actual engineering communication, "thickness" is almost always one of the first questions clients ask. However, this seemingly simple question is often the most easily misunderstood. Many people instinctively believe that thicker is safer and more durable. But in real projects, this approach can actually lead to wasted costs and even affect structural design. Thickness is never a parameter in isolation; it corresponds to the load-bearing structure, installation method, and usage scenario. Discussing thickness without considering these factors easily leads to choosing the wrong direction from the outset.

In traditional architecture and municipal engineering, glass has always been the mainstream material for lighting, fencing, and sound barriers. However, in recent years, a very obvious trend has emerged—more and more projects are starting to replace glass with polycarbonate solid sheets. Many clients ask during consultations, "Why is glass being used less in engineering projects now?" The answer isn't simple; rather, it's because as engineering standards improve, the core logic of material selection has changed: from "usable" to "safer, more efficient, and more durable."